Fixed and corrected leter on Priests and the title father

Satanists @ -

Satanists @ -> @ ShadowSRA ---> if in a world / universe: three-dimensional physical done: we can conceive an ideal, a concept: infinity? objective? universal? rational? this is the demonstration of God, metaphysics, universal brotherhood. ie, humanism. and this is the destruction of: Zionism, racism, sharia bank seigniorage inalienable, nihilism, agnosticism, relativism, materialism, etc. .. But enlightened Masons and decided that the discoveries of Pascal, Maritain, etc. ... were put into the dustbin of history, therefore, all scientific and philosophical research has been exploited by the IMF, and a bunch of corrupt: they have begun to support the lies of evolution, relativism, communism, materialism, horror, porn, etc. ..: and that's why you're going to die, and in fact, in 2013 you'll all be dead. Since for the calculations all the oxygen on the planet will be done intentionally burn


yamasnik SAID: Mate, I dont understand your point. you talk about satanic jews, and then saying you support them.. or something like that lol. you completely confused me, what is your point, and please, make it short. thx --ANSWER-> I am the King of Israel, my first duty is to protect: my people Israel, and then all the others, for I am by God and God is for everyone to allow God's plan, that is, the universal brotherhood. The real threat to the world, are the enlightened of the IMF-World Order, ie seigniorage banking. They are the ones who planned, every holocaust against my people Israel, as for the love of power, they follow Satan's ass like maniacs. All Zionists of shit? protect the enlightened, but not the true interests of Israel

Io sono il Re di Israele, il mio primo dovere è quello di proteggere: il mio popolo: Israele e poi tutti gli altri, poiché io sono da Dio e Dio è per tutti, per permettere ai progetti di Dio, di poter essere realizzati: cioè la fratellanza universale. La vera minaccia per tutto il mondo, sono gli enlightened del FMI-NWO, ie seigniorage banking. Sono loro che hanno progettato, ogni olocausto, contro il mio popolo Israele, poiché per amore del potere, loro seguono come maniaci il culo di satana. Tutti i sionisti di merda? proteggono gli enlightened e non i veri interessi di Israele

Commento al tuo video DI KINGXKINGDOM, a cui youtube, ha chiuso la pagina: MIRACULA UNIUS REI Bambino palestinese rapito da milizie ZIONIST CABAL
yamasnik SAID:you probebly know more then I do about the Talmud, I should check it myself --ANSWER->In fact we have a first Zionist racist, which is that of the priests of the temple of Jerusalem, who are the ones who assembled the Torah. Certainly, the book of Genesis is pure, it is sufficient by itself to bring you to the fullness of holiness. But the Talmud who was born in Babylon is the real root of Satanism! IN REALTÀ noi abbiamo un primo sionismo razzista, che è quello dei sacerdoti del tempio di Gerusalemme, che sono loro che hanno assemblato la Torà. Certamente, il libro di Genesi è puro, esso è sufficiente da solo, a condurti alla pienezza della santità. ma, Il Talmud che è nato a Babilonia è la vera radice del satanismo!

Fixed and corrected leter on Priests and the title father

One of the greatest attacks on the church is the title "father" conferred on to the those in the holy orders of the church. Many heritics see this as a breach of the command of Jesus when he says "Call no man your father on earth, for you have one father, who is in heaven."(Matthew 23:9) First we really have to understand who Jesus is directing this comment to. He is not directing this at a son/daughters biological parent, as without the equiviolent of a fatherhood on earth a heavenly fatherhood would loose all meaning to us. Also in light of the fourth commandment "Honor your father and mother" it makes no sence to direct this passage at biological parents. Jesus is directing this comment at the high ranking Jewish teachers who, "love places of honor at banquets, seats of honor in synagogues, greetings in marketplaces, and the salutation Rabbi"(Matthew 23:6-7), as seen just a couple verses before he makes this pronouncement "call no man on earth your father." To understand the Catholic view on the title of father for a priest, one must first understand that Jesus is prohibiting calling a man on earth(or of the flesh)your father, not a man of GOD(or of the spirit)your father. Jesus makes it perfectly clear that those who are with him in the spirit "do not belong to the world"(John 17:14 and John 17:16), and that they are one in and with him in John 17:23 "I in them(those who believe)and you(GOD the father)in me" So the claues of "on earth" seems to be nol and void for one who lives in the spirit, as they do not belong to the earth.
The reason why it can be said, with all certainty, that Jesus is not prohibiting the use of the word father to those in the spirit is becaues we see it's use and approval throughout the bible, before and after Jesus gave this command. A few examples of this are: Jospeh when he reveals his identity to his brothers states "(GOD) has made me a father to Pharaoh."(Genesis 45:8) Micah when he met the levite said "Be father and priest to me."(Judges 17:10) Job also states thus "I was a father to the poor, searching out the cause of him who was strange to me."(Job 29:16) And after the command of Jesus Stephen while professing his faith to the high priest says "My brothers and fathers, listen. The glory of GOD appeared to our father Abraham."(Acts 7:2) Paul stays much along the same line when addressing the crowd in Jerusalem saying, "My brothers and fathers, listen to what I am about to say in my defence"(Acts 22:1) and again in Romans 9:10 The blessed aplostel says "Our father Isaac." and then there is of couse this "Even if you should have countless guides to Christ, yet you do not have many fathers, for I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel", 1st Corinthians 4:15. That is pretty clear cut so ask yourselves - do you really think the blessed apostel is diobeying Christ words... Or are you just misinterpriting them? None of these examples are dealing with biological fathers but spiritual fathers, just as we reffer to the priest as a spiritual father. So if the word father was literaly prohibited in all useage then both Paul and Stephen are wrong in using the term. However if Jesus was just prohibiting the use of father to those who belong to the world, or those on earth, it would seem to fit with the rest of the bible.
Another question that can be raised, is if Christ had a problem with the use of the word father, don't you think he would have the same problem with one proclaiming others to be there children?.. "My dear children, for whom I am in labor until Christ be formed in you."(Galations 4:19) and "I do not write these things to shame you but to admonish you as my beloved children."(1 Corinthians 4:14)Clearly Paul doesn't. What about John?... "My dear children, I am writing this to you so that you may not sin."(1 John 2:1) and "I have no greater joy then to hear my children are walking in the truth"(3 John 1:4)Cleary John doesn't either. So we see from the blessed apostles that the tittles of both father, and the proclaiming of others as children of a spiritual father, were not only not rejected, as never to be used, but they where in fact in common use and practise in the church during biblical tmes. To have a full explination of this command and to understand also this command in a literal sence, which we should allways try and do with scripture, we must look at it in the light of John 17:20-24. which sates thus, "I do not ask on behalf of these alone, but for those also who believe in Me through their word; that they may all be one; even as You, Father, are in Me and I in You, that they also may be in Us, so that the world may believe that You sent Me."The glory which You have given Me I have given to them, that they may be one, just as We are one; I in them and You in Me, that they may be perfected in unity, so that the world may know that You sent Me, and loved them, even as You have loved Me."Father, I desire that they also, whom You have given Me, be with Me where I am." We understand that no mere man of the flesh should be called a spiritual father, but those living in the spirit and one with GOD(they were even given the glory that the father gave the son)are not men of the flesh, but men of GOD, in unity with him. In the light of John 17:20-24 we clearly see that those like Paul, Stephen, and John are one with the LORD. We also understand that they are crusified to there flesh, and buried with Christ through baptism, and living in the newness of the spirit.(refference Romans 6:3-5) They dont belong to this earth nor live in the flesh. In conculsion we see that when Jesus says "call no man your father on earth" he is not prohibiting either the use of father by a biological child, nor as a title for a spiritual alive believer, that does not belong to the earth. May our spiritual fathers always bring us to greater understanding and guide us, like the children we are, to the light of truth and goodness.

christian-nazi? lol.

christian-nazi? lol. I do not know one! are two words incompatible! I believe that is a lie of hell, because the Christianity is incompatible with Nazism and any dictatorship. Christianity is for the equality of all people and respect for freedom of conscience. So, this tale of Christian-Nazi is a lie, hell, for scare the Jews. and to prevent what is a covenant: natural & inevitable between Jews and Christians, to bless the world. But an alliance is not to be against others, but to create a universal brotherhood among all nations: in the Jewish Temple. i am Rei Unius, Yes, Mahdì e king of Israel
cristian-nazi? lol. io non ne conosco uno solo! sono due parole incompatibili! io credo che sia una menzogna dell'inferno, poiché il cristianesimo è incompatibile con il nazismo e con ogni dittatura. Il cristianesimo è per la uguaglianza di tutti gli uomini. Quindi questa favola dei cristian-nazi è una bugia dell'inferno, per spaventare gli ebrei. e per impedire quella che è una alleanza naturale & inevitabile: tra ebrei e cristiani. Ma non è una allenza per essere contro gli altri, ma per creare la universale fratellanza tra tutte le nazioni: i am Rei Unius

Against [Turkey] ->

Against [Turkey] -> complains that you: the Holy Spirit! you murderer of Kurds and Armenians: murderess! exterminator of Christian, true Mason and perfect accomplice, of enlightened Jewish lobby, of the synagogue of Satan: IMF-NWO. You who hide Noah's Ark on Mount Ararat, as a favor to Satanists, evolutionists, Zionists and Americans. You know, where is the Ark of Noah! I curse thee in the name of Jesus: the abyss of hell is already wide open. under your feet! Soon is your time, where you'll pay for all your crimes, that thou hast done against the human race ("Mother them Turks!") and against Allah: for thou be a perfect Mason!

Commento al tuo video: miracula Rei Unius vs Bambino palestinese rapito da milizie abusive
goodheartlove SAID: This Is All Because this child Was not Involved criminal and terror activity Because he wasn't at school. --ANSWER--> No! that baby is a hero to 7 years! because you are an occupying force: that violated the most fundamental human rights, how to, you are used to kill so many children! This is Satanism! God's disgust for what you do! I am the true King of Israel!
No! quel bambino è un eroe di 7 anni! perché voi siete una forza di occupazione: che violate i più fondamentali diritti dell'uomo, per come, voi siete abituati ad uccidere tanti bambini! Questo è satanismo! Dio ha ribrezzo di quello che voi fate! I am King of true Israel!

Commento al tuo video: Miracula Rei Unius Open Doors World Watch List of satana 2010
goodheartlove SAID: Not that i suggest this premitive Countries That are right, BUT Christians Should look at theire history and What They Have Done to the world. - Answer-> 1). No! with the founding of the Bank of England? the NWO OF Jewish Masonic OF the enlightened: it is perfect! but with the French Revolution that the Jewish lobby of the money: "seigniorage banking" they have control of the story! from 500 years is that maneuver the puppets Christian, since there is no monetary sovereignty? ther is not the Government, but only controlled Masonic and satanic! 2). the living: they are not guilty of the crimes that have made ​​the dead, for to be their already in hell! is that under the direction of Satanists Jews, Muslims too have become satanAllah: also.


Lorenzo the KING OF ISRAEL. You need to have some Miracle to overcome this Technological Superiority, don't you ? -ANSWER->I have no problem with religion, my, it is only a proposal & cultural policy, the rational & universal metaphysical of natural law: against relativism and fragmentation. because, stronger than any power it is to become all whole human race, one only body! namely Rei unius. This miracle has been done by God! it is only our responsibility to live or die. Because if we do not trust ourselves and of brother patriot? Then, the Satanists nihilism, they won in mode: cultural and military. I have been shown to have the psychological resources and spirituli suitable for this operation
@youtube-- Eih, Satan! because you have ravished (without releasing some justification, about a month ago), my "uniusrei2", ie, my most beautiful baby! served to you, to make your human sacrifice to Satan? All my sites? are the same! He...

Re: @youtube-- Eih, Satan!

I've learned in YOUR WORD. Just how precious we are. I've seen in YOUR WORD. That YOU knit us together. I read in YOUR Word.That we're cleansed in Your blood. I'm so thankful YAHUWsha.YOU took my sin and shame. I found out I 'll never be the same...

Authority of the Pope

In this session we will go over who the Pope is, what authority he has, and whether this authority is still valid. Lets first start with who the Pope is. The Pope is the successore of Peter, and since I already hear people protesting this, before I go on, let us dwelve into history and see where this belief comes from. Before we get to Peter let us just deal with the fact of simple apostolic sucession. Saint Clement, who was ordained and taught by Saint Peter and mentioned by Saint Paul in Philippians 4:3, as a coworker who's name is in the book of life writes thus, "Our apostels knew though our LORD Jesus Christ that there would be strife for the office of the bishop. For this reason, therfore, having received perfect foreknowledge, they appointed those who have already been mentioned and afterwards added the futer provisions that, if they should die, other appoved men should succeed to their ministy." Clement in his great knowledge of the apostolic teaching goes on to tell us how these bishops were appointed stateing "Through contryside and city [the apostels] preached, and they appointed their earliest converts, testing them by the spirit, to be bishops and deacons of futer believers. Nor was this a novelty, for bishops and deacons had been written about a long time earlier" Clements epistel to the Corinthians - 80 A.D. Clement is telling us that the apostels did nothing negligently and did everything in the perfect foreknowledge of Christ appointing men who, if the apostels should die, would succeed them. Not only that but he clearly reffers to the bishop as not only a ministry but an office. If one wishes to doubt Clement then they would also have to doubt the decisions and infallibility of the teachings of the apostels, as the apostels appointed Clement and decided to teach him what they knew ordaining him to the office and minsitry of the bishop. And if one doubts the decisions and the infallibility of the teaching of the apostels then one must doubt the scripture as infallible as well, as the scriptures were written by the apostels and decided on by there successores.
Now that we have gone over simple apostalic succesion let us go back to the succesion of the apostel Peter. First tho we should explain who Peter was and what authority(of couse given by GOD) he personally held. The LORD personally speaking to Simon changes his name to Peter " And I say to you, you are Peter(in greek Petros, which is the masculine word for rock) and on this rock(in greek petra, which is the feminime word for rock. Just as in spanish you would use a masuline form for most places and things except the oppisite in greek) I will build my church."(Matthew 16:18) So the first thing that Peter is, is the rock on which the church is built, which "the gates of hell will never prevail against"(Matthew 16:18). Now let us look at what authority he holds. The LORD tells Peter "I give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven." Basically whatever you deem acceptible shall be acceptible in heaven, and whatever you deem unacceptible shall be unacceptible in heaven. "Although he(the LORD) assigns a like power to all the apostels, yet he founder a single chair [cathedra] and he established by his own authority a source and an intrinsic reason for that unity. Indeed the others were that also which Peter was [i.e., apostles], but a primacy is given to Peter, whereby it is made clear that there is but one church and one chair"- Saint Cyprian of Carthage 251 A.D. So Peter has the authority of binding and loosing and holds the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Another authority the LORD gave to Peter is the tending and feeding of the one flock of the LORD, as he comes to Peter after his resurrection and says thus ""Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?" He said to him, "Yes, Lord, you know that I love you." He said to him, "Feed my lambs." He then said to him a second time, "Simon, son of John, do you love me?" He said to him, "Yes, Lord, you know that I love you." He said to him, "Tend my sheep."He said to him the third time, "Simon, son of John, do you love me?" Peter was distressed that he had said to him a third time, "Do you love me?" and he said to him, "Lord, you know everything; you know that I love you." (Jesus) said to him, "Feed my sheep." (John 21:15-17) "Sice the LORD speaking to Peter Himself said "Feed my sheep" (John 21:17), meaning my sheep in general, not these, nor those in particular, whence we understand that he entrusted all to him (Peter). Therefore, if the greeks or others should say that they are not confided to Peter and to his successore, they must confess not being the sheep of Christ, since our LORD says in John "there is one sheepfold and one shepherd" - Pope Boniface VIII november 18, 1302. So Peter was given the authority to tend and feed the one sheepfold of Christ, as well as the authority to bind and loose, and the keys to the kingdom of heaven.
Since we have covered in a very simple way apostelic succession, who and what authority, Peter was and had, let us get down to the apostelic succession of the office and minisrty of Peter imparticularlly. "If the very order of the episcopal (office of the aposels) succession is to be considered how much more surely, truly, and safely do we number them [the bishops of Rome] from Peter himself, to whom, as to one representing the whole church, the LORD said, "Upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not conquer it" The successor of Peter was Linus, and his successors in unbroken continuity were these:— Clement, Anacletus, Evaristus, Alexander, Sixtus, Telesphorus, Iginus, Anicetus, Pius, Soter, Eleutherius, Victor, Zephirinus, Calixtus, Urbanus, Pontianus, Antherus, Fabianus, Cornelius, Lucius, Stephanus, Xystus, Dionysius, Felix, Eutychianus, Gaius, Marcellinus, Marcellus, Eusebius, Miltiades, Sylvester, Marcus, Julius, Liberius, Damasus, and Siricius, whose successor is the present Bishop Anastasius.(and this unbroken line can be traced up to the current Pope Benidict) In this order of succession no Donatist ( false schismatic) is found"- St Augustine(mabey the greatest theologian of all time, whos writtings and teachings are both used and practised in some part by nearly all christian denominations today) 412 A.D. In the year 432 A.D the united council of the church at Ephesus stated this "There is no doubt, and in fact it has been known in all ages, that the holy and most blessed Peter, prince and head of the apostles, pillar of the faith, and foundation of the Catholic church, received the keys of the kingdom from our LORD Jesus Christ, the savior and redeemer of the human race, and that to him was given the power of loosing and binding... who down even to today and forever both lives and judges in his successores." -acts of the council of Ephesus. If the united church was wrong then that must mean that they gates of hell had overcome the church, which we are assured by the LORD that, that would never happen. So from scripture we find the authority that was given, and from the united church we find apostelic succession, and that the authority of Peter both lives and jugdes in his successores. That would mean that just as the authority was valid in the 432, since the Roman church has an unbroken line of succession up to today, the authority of Peter would still today be valid. That authority would include being the rock, pillar, head, and chief of the church, all these titles given either by the LORD himself or by ecumentical council of the united church. This authority would include holding the keys of the kingdom of heaven, having the power to bind and loose, having the power to forgive sins(you can find this power given in John 20:23),and feeding and tending the intire sheepfold and flock of Christ. Well brothers that concludes this session may the grace and fellowship of the LORD, and unity, feeding, and tending of the chair of Peter bring all of us together and strenthen our faith.